Final Interpretation for RI # 38 - Use of 'as a minimum' in C&P elements

Date: 10/31/2003
Subject: Use of 'as a minimum' in C&P elements
CC Part #1 Reference: CC Part 1, Annex C.2.7
CC Part #2 Reference: CC Part 2, Annex E.1 (FCS_CKM)
CC Part #3 Reference:

CC Part 3, Section 4.1 (APE_DES)
CC Part 3, Section 8.2 (ACM_CAP)
CC Part 3, Section 8.3 (ACM_SCP)
CC Part 3 Section 16.1 (AMA_AMP)
CC Part 3 Section 16.2 (AMA_CAT)

CEM Reference:

CEM Part 2 ACM_SCP


Issue:

The CC occasionally uses the phrase 'as a minimum' in content and presentation of evidence elements. In using this phrase the CC explicitly allows the developer to provide additional information. Where this phrase is not used, does the CC imply that the developer is not allowed to provide additional information?



Interpretation

The CC allows the developer to provide additional information to that explicitly required. Therefore, the phrase 'as a minimum' is unnecessary.



Specific Changes

The following change is made to the CC v2.1 Part 1:

The following change is made to the CC v2.1 Part 2:

The following changes are made to the CC v2.1 Part 3:

APE_DES.1.1C

ASE_DES.1.1C

ACM_CAP.5.16C

ACM_SCP.*.1C

AMA_AMP.1.11C

The following changes are made to the CEM v1.0:

Rationale

This interpretation removes the instances of 'as a minimum' as that is the phrase referenced. Other uses of similar phrases, such as 'at a minimum' and 'minimum requirements' are under consideration and will be handled under a separate intepretation in the future.