The informative text for *:ATE_IND.2-1 is a superset of the informative text for *:ATE_FUN.1-4, and all that is added is an additional short paragraph regarding test resources. An evaluator that has recently performed *:ATE_FUN.1-4 might assume that the bulk of *:ATE_IND.2-1 has been completed due to the similarity of the informative text.

There is some unnecessary duplication of text in the supporting paragraphs for work units *:ATE_IND.*-1 and *:ATE_FUN.*-4.

Specific Changes

CEM paragraphs 806, 1144 and 1603 are reworded as follows:

"It is possible for the ST to specify more than one configuration for evaluation. The TOE may be composed of a number of distinct hardware and software implementations that need to be tested in accordance with the ST. The evaluator verifies that there are test configurations identified in the developer test documentation that are consistent with each evaluated configuration described in the ST."

CEM paragraphs 617, 839, 1177 and 1636 are reworded as follows:

"It is possible for the ST to specify more than one configuration for evaluation.The TOE may be composed of a number of distinct hardware and software implementations that need to be tested in accordance with the ST. The evaluator's TOE test configurations should be consistent with each evaluated configuration described in the ST."

CEM paragraph 616 is reworded as follows:

"The TOE used for evaluator testing should have the same unique reference as established by the ACM_CAP.1 sub-activity."

CEM paragraph 805 is reworded as follows:

"The TOE referred to in the developer's test plan should have the same unique reference as established by the ACM_CAP.2 sub-activity."

CEM paragraph 838 is reworded as follows:

"The TOE used for evaluator testing should have the same unique reference as established by the ACM_CAP.2 sub-activity."

CEM paragraph 1143 is reworded as follows:

"The TOE referred to in the developer's test plan should have the same unique reference as established by the ACM_CAP.3 sub-activity."

CEM paragraph 1176 is reworded as follows:

"The TOE used for evaluator testing should have the same unique reference as established by the ACM_CAP.3 sub-activity."

CEM paragraph 1602 is reworded as follows:

"The TOE referred to in the developer's test plan should have the same unique reference as established by the ACM_CAP.4 sub-activity."

CEM paragraph 1635 is reworded as follows:

"The TOE used for evaluator testing should have the same unique reference as established by the ACM_CAP.4 sub-activity."

N/A